Rewoven Kharkiv
[edit] Rewoven Kharkiv
[edit] Reimagining Housing Through Resilience, Community, and Adaptive Regeneration
Project: Rewoven Kharkiv
Competition: Norman Foster Foundation Kharkiv Housing Challenge 2025
Designer: Tsz Kiu Felix Wong, Yau Wai Lam
Studio: T.K. Felix Wong Studio
[edit] 1. Introduction
Rewoven Kharkiv is a conceptual housing proposal developed for the Norman Foster Foundation Kharkiv Housing Challenge 2025. The project explores how architecture can contribute to post-war recovery through adaptive regeneration, modular construction, and socially resilient urban strategies.
Rather than treating reconstruction as a process of replacing what has been destroyed, the proposal investigates how fragmented urban conditions can be transformed into opportunities for collective renewal and long-term sustainability.
[edit] 2. The Context of Kharkiv
Kharkiv has experienced significant urban destruction, displacement, and social disruption due to ongoing conflict. Beyond the physical damage to housing and infrastructure, communities have also faced the loss of stability, identity, and public life.
The project responds to this condition by viewing reconstruction not only as technical repair, but as a civic and cultural process that rebuilds relationships between people, architecture, and the city.
[edit] 3. Design Vision
The central idea behind Rewoven Kharkiv is the concept of “rewoven urbanism,” where disconnected urban fragments are stitched back together through adaptable housing systems and shared community spaces.
The proposal aims to create architecture that is flexible, repairable, and capable of evolving over time. Housing is treated as a living framework rather than a static object.
[edit] 4. Housing as Social Infrastructure
The project positions housing as more than shelter. It becomes a form of social infrastructure capable of supporting interaction, recovery, and collective identity.
Shared courtyards, terraces, circulation spaces, and communal programs are integrated throughout the proposal to encourage social connection and rebuild neighbourhood relationships disrupted by conflict.
[edit] 5. Adaptive Regeneration Strategy
Instead of relying entirely on demolition and replacement, the project adopts a strategy of selective preservation, retrofit, and modular extension.
Existing urban structures are reused wherever possible to reduce material waste, embodied carbon, and construction time. This approach also preserves traces of memory and continuity within the urban environment.
[edit] 6. Modular Construction System
A lightweight prefabricated modular system forms the structural basis of the proposal. The modular approach enables rapid construction, adaptability, and scalability across different urban conditions.
The system is designed to allow phased construction and future expansion while maintaining flexibility for different household configurations and community needs.
[edit] 7. Material and Environmental Strategy
The project prioritizes low-carbon and resource-efficient construction methods. Material selection focuses on durability, thermal performance, and the potential for reuse or disassembly.
Environmental strategies include passive ventilation, daylight optimization, insulated building envelopes, and green communal spaces that improve environmental quality and long-term sustainability performance.
[edit] 8. Human-Centered Living Environment
The proposal emphasizes dignity, comfort, and emotional well-being alongside technical efficiency. Spaces are designed to encourage natural light, visual openness, and connections to landscape and shared outdoor environments.
By prioritizing both individual privacy and collective interaction, the project aims to create healthier and more supportive living conditions for displaced communities.
[edit] 9. Public Space and Community Recovery
Public space plays a critical role within the proposal. Landscaped courtyards, pedestrian connections, and community gathering areas are integrated into the housing framework to strengthen neighbourhood cohesion.
The project views public life as essential to post-war recovery, helping rebuild trust, belonging, and everyday social interaction within the city.
[edit] 10. Tectonics and Architectural Expression
The architectural language of the proposal is shaped by structural clarity and material honesty. Exposed structural systems and modular construction components communicate how the building is assembled and adapted over time.
Rather than concealing construction, the project celebrates tectonic expression as part of the architectural identity of recovery and resilience.
[edit] 11. Sustainability and Long-Term Resilience
Rewoven Kharkiv approaches sustainability beyond energy performance alone. The proposal integrates environmental responsibility, social resilience, adaptability, and long-term urban regeneration into a unified framework.
The project argues that resilient housing must be capable of responding not only to environmental challenges, but also to social and cultural transformation over time.
[edit] 12. Conclusion
Rewoven Kharkiv explores how post-war reconstruction can move beyond emergency response toward a more regenerative and human-centered future. Through modular adaptability, sustainable construction, and socially driven urban strategies, the project proposes a new approach to collective housing recovery.
The proposal ultimately asks how architecture can help communities rebuild continuity, identity, and hope while creating resilient environments for future generations.
Featured articles
Check out some of the best features and news from Designing Buildings as well as key stories from around the web.
Government brings British Steel into public ownership.
UKCW Birmingham returns with bold new theme and focus.
New guidance published on competence requirements for self-certification schemes.
Construction Management, 8 July
NEETs crisis drives interest in trades, but apprenticeships barriers remain.
Passive fire protection webinar
MEP services penetration seals.
Where its at podcast (and video) - The role of the Architectural Technologist as an Expert Witness.
More than 200 remarkable buildings added to SAVE’s Buildings at Risk register.
Government scraps pre-application consultation for Nationally Significant Infrastructure Projects.
Historic England and infrastructure
New projects offer opportunities for the historic environment and local communities.
Construction Management, 2 July
Construction deaths halve in two years.
Green Book changes to drive investment in all parts of UK.
Minimum energy efficiency standards (MEES)
CIAT briefing on response to consultations for privately rented non-domestic properties.

















